Search
Project Workspace
Site Map
Contact Us
Home About the Project VKP Gallery People and Projects Resources
The Project Today Overview People and Projects Newsletter
About the Project

What We See @Three: Preparing for the
Summer Institute

Focusing on the work of individuals as a way of advancing our work together has always been an important feature of the summer institutes. During this past year we have been able to focus on individual projects through their electronic “posters” created by faculty, as more and more of their work becomes public and on the Web. For this Summer Institute, we hope to take advantage not only of individual projects but of the “visibility” of this work through the VKP website.

We also hope to make an important expansion in the project, from looking at individual projects to thinking about projects in juxtaposition, as well. We are planning for this collaboration to take two forms at the Summer Institute: (1) Faculty with similar thematic projects will discuss ways to publish their findings collaboratively (or dialogically) in one of several venues we will discuss there and later here in the newsletter. (2) Some participants will also plan to engage in some collaborative inquiry in the year or two ahead, exploring how their future investigations might share frameworks, rubrics, assignments, types of evidence, etc. (Of course, after the Summer Institute we will work very hard to insure that all VKP participants, not just those in attendance, will be part of these plans.)

Interactive List: Transforming the Working Group Process

In this issue of the newsletter, we have created an interactive list of all participants (and their project posters) who are attending the Summer Institute. We have arranged the Working Groups according to themes shared across individual projects. Naturally, there are many ways to organize the projects and all projects have multiple dimensions. But these research threads seem to make sense as starting places for conversation.

In each thematic area are listed five or six names. The first three projects in each group, most of which have already gone through the working group process in previous years, will be considered in a collective manner. These participants will give shorter presentations than in the past, and the discussion will focus on the projects collectively and on common issues across them.

Secondly, within each group are names with the letters (WG) after them. These are projects that will go through the traditional Working Group process, where the whole group focuses on each member's project in turn. In general, these are projects that have not gone through the working group process before, or they are projects that have not had, in their post-investigation phase, a lot of collaborative interaction throughout the year.

Our intention is that these projects will be looked at, to some extent, as a grouping. We hope that the whole group can explore some of the shared themes, methods, and findings as part of the emerging collective work of the project. On the third day, we will spend the working group time engaged in activities designed to foster this collaboration.

We are asking those attending the Summer Institute to prepare by reading—at least—all the posters in their assigned group, thinking especially about the commonalities and connections across these projects. We are also asking that all participants read the first two readings, listed under "common readings," on our Summer Institute Readings page.

This is a critical and exciting moment in the Project, as we see not only the ongoing development of new projects and new faculty participants—whose launch we want to facilitate in every way—but also the evolution of the work into more fine-grained, detailed inquiries into student learning.

Interactive Working Groups List

  • All participants' names in the chart are linked to their VKP project posters. Find your group on the list and then click on name of others from your group.
  • You may also click on the working group themes listed below to find that particular group.

WORKING GROUPS

Tools and scaffolding for increased comprehension
Close reading
Visual texts (Using)
Visual texts (Creating)
Visual texts (Reading)
Making skills visible
Making meaning of/connections with texts
Discussion and other tools to enhance discussion/writing/ performance

 

  • Tools and scaffolding
    for increased comprehension
Leona Fisher

Susan Oliver

Suzanne Schick
Heidi Elmendorf (WG)
Juan Gutierrez (WG)


  • Close reading
Julie Yen
Patricia O'Connor
Joe Ugoretz
Mark Shoenfeld
Sharona Levy (WG)
Leonard Vogt (WG)

  • Visual texts (Using)
Melinda de Jesus
Cecilia O'Leary
Gloria Dickinson
Gilbert Neri (WG)
Lawrence Hanley (WG)

  • Visual texts (Creating)
Tracey Weis
David Jaffee
Stephanie Tingley
Kevin Leander (WG)
Alice Gambrell (WG)

  • Visual texts (Reading)
Peter Felten
Betsi Stephen
Susan Kilgore
Roberto Lint-Sagarena (WG)
Jane Iwamura (WG)

  • Making skills visible
John Ward
Sherry Linkon
Melissa Smith
Kim Pearson (WG)
Janet Hecsh (WG)

  • Making meaning of/connections with texts
Arthur Lau
Rachel Theilheimer
Martha Pallante
Lois Leveen
Christine Sleeter (WG)
Amy Holzgang (WG)

  • Discussion and other tools
    to enhance discussion/writing/ performance
Group One Group Two
Gail Green-Anderson Paula Berggren
Lynne Adrian Mills Kelly
Stacy Morgan (WG) Susanne Nimmricther (WG)
Ed Gallagher (WG) Christine Gaudry-Hudson (WG)
  Sally Webster (WG)
 

July 2003

July 2003 Home
Emerging Issues:
   -Working Groups
   -Project Posters Part 3
   -SI Readings
Project Profiles
Website News
Resources