 |
PROJECT PROFILES
Highlights of the Visible Knowledge
Project: 2002-2003
By Lorraine Graham
During the past year, the Visible Knowledge
Project has increasingly focused on creating and nurturing “local
dialogues.” VKP faculty on both the East and West Coasts have
worked to enhance collaboration and research by meeting at regional
institutes to share and discuss their work on the scholarship of
teaching and learning. VKP participants are creating and working
with different models of “local dialogues”—such
as the Teaching Cooperative at CSUMB and the Digital Stories Affinity
Group—designed to expand and enrich regional and campus-wide
collaboration. Following another model, VKP faculty at Georgetown
University and CUNY worked in tandem with a campus-wide event to
share their research, extending the work of the Project outwards
beyond VKP participants and into the larger university community.
LOCAL DIALOGUE ON THE WEST COAST
The West Coast Institute |
|
|
To nurture this trend of “local
dialogues” activity, VKP faculty at California State University-Monterey
Bay (CSUMB) hosted a regional institute. The West Coast Institute
was the first of many successful local events during the past year.
From January 24-26, 2003, participants from CSUMB, Cerritos College,
California State University-Sacramento (CSUS), University of Southern
California, Reed College, and Arizona State converged at CSUMB for
collaboration, workshops, great food, and sun.
Participants expressed how helpful
it was to have an event locally. Lois
Leveen (Independent) pointed out that “while the Summer
Institutes have been wonderful, it was great to have a smaller,
midyear event. The West Coast Institute was a great opportunity
to learn more about the work of a smaller group of colleagues.”
Fostering local dialogues on the West Coast, where faculty on different
campuses are often geographically far away from each other, can
be difficult. Jan
Connal (Cerritos) asserted that VKP faculty at Cerritos College
and on the West Coast in general “need to work really hard
at getting our VKP group together to create the type of camaraderie
and interest needed to sustain local dialogues.” The West
Coast Institute provided many opportunities for faculty to share
research experiences and to get to know each other better.
The West Coast Institute attendees
reviewed the Visible Knowledge Project scholarship of teaching and
learning process—beginning with an overview of the Project,
moving to constructing and narrowing researchable questions, working
with evidence, and concluding with a discussion of possibilities
for VKP campuses and individual scholars.
CSUMB campus coordinator, Cecilia
O'Leary, welcomed the group and placed their work in a political
context of social change. In particular, she linked the inquiry
into teaching and learning to encouraging students to be imaginative,
to ask difficult questions, and to act to improve the world.
On Saturday, the Institute focused
on defining a research question and working with evidence of student
learning. Aaron
Cohen (CSUS), Patricia
O'Connor (Georgetown), and Gilbert
Neri (CSUMB) walked the group through their own process of inquiry
in their projects, illustrating the balance between narrowing and
refining the researchable questions while keeping broader goals
in mind. For
Lois Leveen and other independent faculty who are not affiliated
with a core campus, learning about other VKP faculty projects and
processes of inquiry was particularly invigorating. Leveen
felt that the Institute helped her “feel more connected to
the work other people were doing midway through the school year.”
Kimberly
Duff (Cerritos) found the meeting “very stimulating in
terms of actually getting to know the faculty who were implementing
the projects,” and especially “appreciated hearing how
faculty had to revise their initial ideas to fit their student population.”
In the Saturday afternoon session on
coding data, scholars explored one way to work with qualitative
data. During the session, faculty experimented with applying four
pre-determined categories to a think aloud interview and a set of
Blackboard postings. By the end of the day, participants began to
see ways to use this kind of data to explain something significant
about student learning and impacts of faculty teaching. For Jan
Connal, “the best part of participating in the West Coast
VKP was the realization that we were not only collecting evidence
of student learning but interpreting it.” As an Educational
Psychologist, Connal
is trained in quantitative research methods and is “fascinated
by the VKP’s qualitative approach to capturing evidence of
student learning.”
All participants marveled at the collaborative
and profoundly interdisciplinary environment of the West Coast Institute.
“Although it is rare that faculty from so many different disciplines
and institutions come together,” said Kimberly
Duff, “I believe that the diversity of our backgrounds
enhanced the discussions.” Such an environment is encouraged
and nurtured by the Visible Knowledge Project. One of the ways in
which the Project seeks to emphasize and develop collaborative work
and conversation across the disciplines is through triad conversations.
The Sunday morning session of the Institute focused on changing
the research paradigm in scholarship of teaching and learning, and
began with an explanation of these triad conversations. During these
calls, three VKP scholars discuss methods of working with, and meanings
of, evidence of student learning. Julie
Yen (CSUS), Lois
Leveen (Independent Investigator), Rina
Benmayor (CSUMB), and Patricia
O'Connor participated in one set of these talks and shared their
experiences.
Participants reported that triad conversations
and small local VKP Institutes emphasize collaboration and help
push faculty towards an interdisciplinary learning experience which
more closely matches that of their students. “Our students
take classes from all different disciplines (e.g. math, sociology,
history, etc),” Kimberly
Duff noted, “yet it is rare for faculty to take an interdisciplinary
approach.” Participants all reported the benefits of collaboration
and suggested ways to maintain consistent exchange. For example,
as a social psychologist, Duff
was “pleased, but surprised” that she could enhance
her course psychologically “through generation of ideas from
people in non-psychologically related courses.”
Thus, in an arena where all could share
and learn, the West Coast Institute introduced new members to the
VKP and advanced the Project’s focus on the evidence of student
learning.
The CSUMB Teaching Cooperative
VKP at CSUMB has sought to establish
a diverse group of participants and encourage and build “local
dialogues” activity. To that end they have fostered interaction
and collaboration with colleagues—including junior faculty—from
other colleges and departments at CSUMB who are working on projects
involved with new media and innovative pedagogy. As part of this
effort to encourage interdisciplinary scholarship, collaboration,
and dialogue between VKP participants and non-VKP members, the Teaching
Cooperative at CSUMB has sought to reach out in a sustained way
to a group of colleagues. |
|
| With developmental
support from the Project’s central staff, the CSUMB Teaching
Cooperative hosts a series of seminars aimed at enhancing dialogue.
These seminars began with learning about how to use new media in
the classroom, and encourage thinking about what it means to make
knowledge visible in teaching and learning. Seminar attendees learn
about pedagogical approaches that can be used to engage students
in high-level thinking, and design research projects for their classes
using these approaches.
Other VKP participants are assisting
their institution introduce and train faculty and staff in new technologies,
pedagogical techniques, and the scholarship of teaching and learning.
Jan
Connal reports that Cerritos College “is relying on [the
VKP] faculty team, along with about four other projects, to provide
the foundation for faculty development at Cerritos.” This
is an example of how the model provided by the CSUMB seminars can
be used in other situations and locations to help non-VKP faculty
think about the scholarship of teaching and learning, the application
of new technology in the classroom, and to learn to collect classroom-based
evidence to provide insights on student learning.
LOCAL DIALOGUE IN NEW YORK
CUNY VKP Meeting
On February 7, the three CUNY campuses
collaborated on a wonderful day of activity in NYC, including a
three-hour public presentation, attended by 70-80 participants.
Coordinated and conceived of by David
Jaffee, Gail
Green-Anderson, Joe
Ugoretz, and Bret Enyon, this event was a compliment to the
regional meetings begun in February 2002 to expand affinity group
communications and for “local dialogues” activity.
The day started with a combined CUNY
VKP session, during which Rafael
Corbalan (BMCC), Larry
Hanley (City College and the Graduate Center), and Gail
Green-Anderson (LGCC) all presented their VKP projects to the
group. Anderson
was excited to touch base with colleagues about their research projects:
“Having watched my colleagues in VKP develop their projects
from the initial light bulb stage, to the in-class research stage,
I am thrilled to learn about preliminary findings.” There
was good general conversation about the next 2-3 years of the project,
including plans for publication of project results, and managing
possible growth of campus-based participants while continuing to
deepen the projects underway. Randy
Bass and Michael
Coventry where both there to represent the Project’s central
staff. |
|
| In the afternoon, the CUNY VKP campuses hosted the first event in
the Graduate Center’s “Interdisciplinary Conversations”
series. After showing the VKP video, Arthur
Lau (LGCC), Rachel
Theillheimer (BMCC), and David
Jaffee (City College and the Graduate Center) presented their
work. Gail
Green-Anderson points out how the VKP has nourished interest among
the participants in each other’s projects. Maintaining this
contact and interest is necessary to encourage collaboration and dialogue.
“It is important for us to get opportunities to find out how
the work is progressing,” said Green-Anderson.
The February meeting in New York provided such an opportunity. |
|
After these presentations, Paula
Berrgren (Baruch College and the Graduate Center) gave some
brief comments following her appearance in the video, and Randy
Bass gave a wrap up presentation of some overarching issues
in the scholarship of teaching and learning. Participants acknowledged
the value of interacting with colleagues in a small and focused
setting. Rachel
Theillheimer appreciated the chance to present her work in a
supportive environment: “An event like the one in February
gives me a deadline to work toward, and the feedback I receive propels
me forward.” The conversations sparked by the presentations
continued into a lively reception, which brought the day to a close.
As with the West Coast Institute in
late January, the CUNY VKP event demonstrated how effective “regional”
events can be in moving the project forward. It also reinforced
how much progress and scholarship is taking place inside the project—even
since the Summer Institute—and how much interest there is
in this kind of work and the project in general.
Digital Stories Affinity Group Conference
at LaGuardia Community College
The Digital Storytelling Affinity Group
gathered at LaGuardia Community College, CUNY, for a three-day conference
May 7-9, 2003. Tracy
Weis (Millersville University) joined Rina
Benmayor and Cecilia
O'Leary (CSUMB) for an event hosted by Bret Eynon of LaGuardia.
In addition to sharing their work with several groups of LaGuardia
faculty and a group of LaGuardia students, Thursday afternoon's
session with VKP participants from throughout the New York area
focused on digital stories as evidence of student learning.
The Conference began on Wednesday afternoon
with a public presentation. Rina
Benmayor, Cecilia
O'Leary, and Tracy
Weis gave a talk open to LaGuardia Faculty on Digital Storytelling.
They also presented an update on the electronic portfolios initiative.
On Thursday morning, Rina Benmayor
used examples of student projects from her poster to present digital
storytelling to a crowd of students and technical assistants. The
students found the idea of the electronic portfolio especially relevant
to their own professional needs and goals. There was a useful discussion
about how to incorporate digital storytelling techniques and electronic
portfolios into personal statements. |
|
|
Later that afternoon there was a citywide
VKP meeting to discuss the implications of linking digital storytelling
to projects on the scholarship of teaching and learning. Rina
Benmayor again effectively used her poster to present an assessment
rubric describing ways of dealing with evidence of student learning.
In addition, Cecilia
O'Leary showed some examples of digital stories to the group.
An exciting and deeply interdisciplinary conversation about how
to interpret and define evidence of student learning followed.
The last event of the conference was a workshop with the faculty
of the electronic portfolio pilot project. On Friday morning, the
pilot faculty met for several hours to discuss and explore the ways
and means by which digital storytelling could be integrated with
electronic portfolios.
LOCAL DIALOGUE AT GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
VKP Participates in Campus-Wide Event
at Georgetown University
VKP participants at Georgetown University
are also helping create local dialogue. On November 21, Georgetown
VKP faculty held a panel discussion in conjunction with “Innovations
Day,” a campus-wide event designed to give faculty from all
three campuses at Georgetown University (Main, Medical, and Law)
an opportunity to share their unique ways of incorporating technology
and new pedagogies into their teaching and academic projects. |
|
 |
Randy Bass addresses Georgetown
faculty while VKP Project posters are on display |
Participants in the VKP panel, held
in the morning, included Patricia
O'Connor (English), Eddie Maloney (CNDLS and English), Randy
Bass (CNDLS and English), Frank
Ambrosio (Philosophy), Leona
Fisher (English), Betsi
Stephen (School of Foreign Service), and Ed Ingebretsen (English).
O'Connor, Associate Professor in the Department of English, delivered
a presentation titled "Making Sense of Evidence: Signs of Student
Learning," which asked the question, "Does using hypertext
to illustrate associative thinking yield closer reading habits in
students?" Her goal was to illustrate and deepen student understanding
of literature by delving into the social, historical, and cultural
contexts.
That afternoon, VKP faculty joined
a dessert and poster session where they showcased their work on
the scholarship of teaching and learning. This session was the culmination
of a weeklong exhibition of the posters in the ICC Galleria. The
posters were moved from ICC to Copley Formal Lounge for the Innovations
Day event.
Back to
top
|
|

|
July 2003
July 2003 Home
Emerging Issues
Project Profiles
Website News
Resources
|
 |